yamaha motif xs vs korg m3 in 60 seconds
mLan16e2 expansion on motif xs handles 16 channels out and 6 channels in at 44.1 khz
korg exb-fw, only does 6 out and 2 in at 48khz. Motif wins.
As a performance synth, the m3 wins. It has karma, drum pads, drum track, xy pad, chord memory.
Motif has an arp.
As a sequencer, Motif wins. Motif has pattern based sequencing as well as a linear song mode. Each pattern has 16 different sections. Recorded phrases have independent lengths, and phrases can be reused on different tracks effortlessly. The first 8 tracks, sound exactly as they sound in program mode because all the efx are retained. Easy to solo and mute tracks. Seamless switching between patterns. The killer feature is being able to drop in and out of record and change active track as your pattern loops. Recording arps to the sequencer is also much simpler than on the m3. Only cool thing m3 has over motif is the ease with which you can bounce a sequence to an audio file and save it to a USB device.
As a sampler, M3 slaughters the motif xs. You have single click access to sampling from any mode so resampling a program, combi or sequence is a easy as pi 3.14. Creating a sample based program is easy on the m3 as well. Switching zones and making edits is pretty straight forward. Sampler has a bit of a tacked on feel on the XS and the interface suggests it can be only accessed from sequencer mode but you can actually get to it from program mode. Sampler nomenclature on the XS is confusing if you have ever used another sampler. Waveform maps to instrument, keybank is a sample with zone attributes as well. The M3 screen is brighter and has better contrast so sample waveform editing is easier on the eyes.
As a synth, m3 gives you a lot more options and wins in the fantasy sound creation arena. The motif has better samples in my opinion and excels in recreating acoustic instruments and layered sounds. The m3 can create great layers in combi mode but the main handicap of that mode is that you cannot create your layers in context. You have to create individual programs and them layer them in combi mode. If the source programs change, so do the combis. A standard motif xs program has 8 elements and each of these elements can be triggered in a variety of ways: key on, key up, delayed, cycled etc. Modulation routes tend to be fixed on the motif so for example you get dedicated envelopes and LFOs for pitch, filter and amp. There are only 6 realtime control routes on the motif. The realtime controllers available for use in the routes are mod wheel, pitch wheel, breath controller, 2 assignable knobs, 2 assignable switches, ribbon, footswitch and foot control.
The m3 has an xy touch screen, value slider, ribbon, 4 axis joystick, expression pedal, 8 pads, 2 switches, multiple banks of 8 sliders.
An M3 program has access to 5 insert effects with presets, 2 master effects and a master effect. This is great in program mode but the same 5+2+1 effects have to be shared in combi and sequencer mode. Sucks big time. XS programs have 2 inserts, a chorus and a reverb. Not much compared to the m3 but in sequencer mode, the first 8 tracks retain their insert effects. Thats sweeeet!
The m3 also has the radias expansion but the motif has logic control. A lot more on that later.
Sorry i have to ran now. 2 B continued.

bite me
finish your review please–this is all interesting. Do you think that 64MB RAM on the M3 is a serious limitation?
@apophenia
I’d only consider 64mb of memory a limitation if you care about the Xpanded libraries or if you intend to use the M3 as a full DAW to record long audio sections like entire vocal or guitar tracks. For “normal” use, such as instruments sampling, resampling a few bars and snatches from records, I found I never used my memory expansion. If you are more of a programmer, I’d recommend you put the money towards the EXB-Radias expansion. It was a lot more bang for the buck in my opinion. You’ll get a lot more sonic variety from the Radias board than you will from the same old tired brass and woodwinds
Excellent input on the comparison and contrast of m3 vs motif xs!!
Id love to hear what your thoughts are on the fantom g series as im undecided in which of the 3 to purchase!
heard a comment that you cant sequence via STEP MODE in the yamaha motif xs series! is that true?
I mostly write latin jazz and Brazilian type of music so lots of syncopated notes etc.Loading step mode sometimes saves me time!
Anyhow…thanks again for your inpuys and hope to hear more of your comments in the near future!!
@alfred gori
Hi Alfred, what you heard is correct. The XS has no step recording but I didn’t find that to be a huge limitation since you can set a 100% quantize strength, loop and record your notes in realtime. Even better, you can use the play fx to push or pull note start, adjust note velocity/pitch non destructively. Using just PLAY FX, you could start by recording a bars of straight C notes; shift the pitch on the downbeats to play kicks, shift the pitch on the upbeats to play snares, shift the pitches other beats to play a hi-hats and push the time on alternate beats to create a swung feel.
You could also use the arp to generate the basic rhythms and tweak them later to personalize them. If I remember correctly, the latin and Brazilian arp patterns are quite well played. The possibilities are endless really.
You should take a look at the Play FX section in the manual. I think its a brilliant feature and the bonus is that its non destructive.
As far as the Roland Fantom G, I don’t think I can give an objective opinion about it. As much as I loved my MV-8000, I have a bias towards Roland synths. Typically, it takes me just a couple of minutes to get a song going on a workstation but I sat at one for about 15 minutes and was unable to grasp the interface.
Hi Admin and thaks for your prompt reply.The reason im keen on being able to record on step mode is that there are certain written passages that i couldnt even beggin to decifer let alone play unless i hear them first.
Does the M3 have step mode recording where i could for instance write half a bar of half note triplets in 4/4 and tie it over to a doted quarter note followed by 16 32nd notes for one beat and so on!? Sometimes i get transcribed solos that are pretty radical and would like to hear what they would sound like.
Well my freind….thanks to your input and others ive narrowed my choice to either the motiv xs or the M3.I like the idea of being able to save your sequences on a usb device.
or be able to hook up a cd burner and download your song to a cd.
How does it work with the motiv? Must you use Q base and acomputer to download into a cd?
Well my freind…again thak you for all the input!!